The Power of Movement in Plants
A more severe trial was now made; little tubes of very thin glass, closed at their upper ends and coated with black varnish, were slipped over the cotyledons of Phalaris (which had germinated in darkness) and just fitted them. Narrow stripes of the varnish had been previously scraped off one side, through which alone light could enter; and their dimensions were afterwards measured under the microscope. As a control experiment, similar unvarnished and _ trans- parent tubes were tried, and they did not prevent the cotyledons bending towards the light. Two cotyledons were placed before a south-west window, one of which was illuminated by a stripe in the varnish, only -004 inch (071 mm.) in breadth and ‘016 inch (0-4 mm.) in length ; and the other by a stripe ‘008 inch in breadth and ‘06 inch in length. The seedlings were examined after an exposure of 7 h. 40 m., and were found to be manifestly bowed towards the light. Some other coty- ledons were at the same time treated similarly, ex- cepting that the little stripes were directed not to the sky, but in such a manner that they received only the diffused light from the room ; and these cotyledons did not become at all bowed. Seven other cotyledons were iluminated through narrow, but comparatively long, cleared stripes in the varnish—namely, in breadth between ‘01 and -026 inch, and in length between -15 and -3 inch; and these all became bowed to the side, by which light entered through the stripes, whether these were directed towards the sky or to one side of
the room. That light passing through a hole only 004 inch in breadth by -016 in length, should induce curvature, seems to us a surprising fact. Before we knew how extremely sensitive the coty- ledons of Phalaris were to light, we endeavoured to trace their circumnutation in darkness by the aid ¢f a small wax taper, held for a minute or two at each observation in nearly the same position, a little on the left side in front of the vertical glass on which the tracing was made. The seedlings were thus observed seventeen times in the course of the day, at intervals of from half to three-quarters of an hour; and late in the evening we were surprised to find that all the 29 coty- ledons were greatly curved and pointed towards the vertical glass, a little to the left where the taper had been held. The tracings showed that they had tra- velled in zigzag lines. Thus, an exposure to a feeble light for a very short time at the above specified intervals, sufficed to induce well-marked heliotropism. An analogous case was observed with the hypocotyls of Solanum lycopersicum. We at first attributed this result to the after-effects of the light on each oceasion ; but since reading Wiesner’s observations,* which will be referred to in the last chapter, we cannot doubt that an intermittent light is more efficacious than a con- tinuous one, as plants are especially sensitive to any contrast in its amount.
The cotyledons of Phalaris bend much more slowly towards a very obscure light than towards a bright one. Thus, in the experiments with seedlings placed in a dark room at 12 feet from a very small lamp, they were just perceptibly and doubtfully curved towards it after 3 h., and only slightly, yet certainly, after 4 h After 8h. 40 m. the chords of their ares were deflected from the perpendicular by an average angle of only 16°. Had the light been bright, they would have become much more curved in between 1 and 2 h. Several trials were made with seedlings placed at various distances from a small lamp in a dark room; but we will give only one trial. Six pots were placed at distances of 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 feet from the lamp, before which they were left for 4h. As light decreases in a geometrical ratio, the seedlings in the 2nd pot received 3th, those in the 8rd pot +;th, those in the 4th ~,th, those in the 5th ,1;th, and those in the 6th —1,th of the light received by the seedlings in the first or nearest pot. ‘Therefore it might have been expected that there would have been an immense differ- ence in the degree of their heliotropic curvature in the several pots; and there was a well-marked difference between those which stood nearest and furthest from the lamp, but the difference in each successive pair of pots was extremely small. In order to avoid prejudice, we asked three persons, who knew nothing about the experiment, to arrange the pots in order according to the degree of curvature of the cotyledons. The first person arranged them in proper order, but doubted long between the 12 feet and 16 feet pots; yet these two received light in the proportion of 36 to 64. The second person also arranged them properly, but doubted between the 8 feet and 12 feet pots, which received light in the proportion of 16 to 36. ‘The third person arranged them in wrong order, and doubted about four of the pots. This evidence shows conclusively how little the curvature of the seedlings differed in the successive pots, in comparison with the great difference in the amount of light which thev received; and it should be noted that there was no
excess of superfluous light, for the cotyledons became but little and slowly curved even in the nearest pot. Close to the 6th pot, at the distance of 20 feet from the lamp, the light allowed us just to distinguish a dot 3°56 mm. (14 inch) in diameter, made with Indian ink on white paper, but not a dot 2°29 mm. (‘09 inch) in diameter. The degree of curvature of the cotyledons of Phalaris within a given time, depends not merely on the amount of lateral light which they may then receive, but on that which they have previously received from above and on all sides. Analogous facts have been given with respect to the nyctitropic and periodic movements of plants. Oftwo pots containing seedlings of Phalaris which had germinated in darkness, one was still kept in the dark, and the other was exposed (Sept. 26th) to the light in a greenhouse during a cloudy day and on the following bright morning. On this morn- ing (27th), at 10.30 a.m., both pots were placed in a box, blackened within and open in front, before a north-east window, protected by a linen and muslin blind and by a towel, so that but little light was admitted, though the sky was bright. Whenever the pots were looked at, this was done as quickly as pos- sible, and the cotyledons were then held transversely with respect to the light, so that their curvature could not have been thus increased or diminished. After 50 m. the seedlings which had previously been kept in darkness, were perhaps, and after 70 m. were cer- tainly, curved, though very slightly, towards the window. After 85 m. some of the seedlings, which had previously been illuminated, were perhaps a little affected, and after 100 m. some of the younger ones were certainly a little curved towards the light. At this time (i.e. after 100 m.* there was a plain difference
in the curvature of the seedlings in the two pots. After 2 bh. 12 m. the chords of the ares of four of the most strongly curved seedlings in each pot were measured, and the mean angle from the perpendicular of those which had previously been kept in darkness was 19°, and of those which had previously been illu- minated only 7°. Nor did this difference diminish during two additional hours. As a check, the seed- lings in both pots were then placed in complete dark- ness for two hours, in order that apogeotropism should act on them; and those in the one pot which were little curved became in this time almost completely upright, whilst the more curved ones in the other pot still remained plainly curved.
Two days afterwards the experiment was repeated, with the sole difference that even less light was admitted through the window, as it was protected by a linen and muslin blind and by two towels; the sky, moreover, was somewhat less bright. The result was the same as before, excepting that everything occurred rather slower. he seedlings which had been pre- viously kept in darkness were not in the least curved after 54 m., but were so after 7) m. Those which had previously been illuminated were not at all affected until 130 m, had elapsed, and then only slightly. After 145 m. some of the seedlings in this latter pot were certainly curved towards the light; and there was now a plain difference between the two pots. After 3h. 45 m. the chords of the ares of 3 seedlings in each pot were measured, and the mean angle from the perpendicular was 16° for those in the pot which had previously been kept in darkness, and only 5° for those which had previously been illuminated.
The curvature of the cotyledons of Phalaris towards a lateral ight is therefore certainly influenced by the degree to which they have been previously illu- minated. We shall presently see that the influence of light on their bending continues for a short time after the light has been extinguished. ‘These facts, as well as that of the curvature not increasing or de- creasing in nearly the same ratio with that of the amount of light which they receive, as shown in the trials with the plants before the lamp, all indicate that light acts on them as a stimulus, in somewhat the same manner as on the nervous system of animals, and not in a direct manner on the cells or cell-walls which by their contraction or expansion cause the curvature.
It has already been incidentally shown how slowly the cotyledons of Phalaris bend towards a very dim light; but when they were placed before a bright paraffin lamp their tips were all curved rectangularly towards itin2 h. 20m. The hypocotyls of Solanwm lycopersicum had bent in the morning at right angles towards a north-east window. At 1 p.m. (Oct. 21st) the pot was turned round, so that the seedlings now pointed from the light, but by 5 p.m. they had reversed their curvature and again pointed to the light. They had thus passed through 180° in 4 h., having in the morning previously passed through about 90°. But the reversal of the first half of the curvature will have been aided by apogeotropism. Similar cases were observed with other seedlings, for instance, with those of Sinapis alba.
We attempted to ascertain in how short a time light acted on the cotyledons of Phalaris, but this was difficult on account of their rapid circumnutating movement; moreover, they differ much in sensibility, eccording to age; nevertheless, some of our observa- tions are worth giving. Pots with seedlings wee placed under a microscope provided with an eye-piece micrometer, of which each division equalled ;}4th of an inch (0051 mm.) ; and they were at first illuminated by light from a paraffin lamp passing through a solu- tion of bichromate of potassium, which does not induce heliotropism. Thus the direction in which the coty- ledons were circumnutating could be observed inde- pendently of any action from the light ; and they could be made, by turning round the pots, to circumnutate transversely to the line in which the light would strike them, as soon as the solution was removed. The fact that the direction of the circumnutating movement might change at any moment, and thus the plant might bend either towards or from the lamp indepen- dently of the action of the light, gave an element of uncertainty to the results. After the solution had been removed, five seedlings which were circumnutat- ing transversely to the line of light, began to move towards it, in 6, 4, 74, 6, and 9 minutes. In one of these cases, the apex of the cotyledon crossed five of the divisions of the micrometer (i.e. zdgth of an inch, or 0°254 mm.) towards the light in 3m. Of two seedlings which were moving directly from the light at the time when the solution was removed, one began to move towards it in 13 m., and the other in 15 m. This latter seedling was observed for more than an hour and continued to move towards the light; it crossed at one time 5 divisions of the micrometer (0254 mm.) in 2 m. 30s. In all these cases, the movement towards the light was extremely unequal in rate, and the cotyledons often remained almost sta- tionary for some minutes, and two of them retrograded a little. Another seedling which was circumnutating transversely to the line of light, moved towards it in 4 m. after the solution was removed; it then remained
almost stationary for 10 m.; then crossed 5 divisions of the micrometer in 6 m.; and then 8 divisions in ll m. This unequal rate of movement, interrupted by pauses, and at first with occasional retrogressions, accords well with our conclusion that heliotropism consists of modified circumnutation. In order to observe how long the after-effects of light lasted, a pot with seedlings of Phalaris, which had germinated in darkness, was placed at 10.40 a.m. before a north-east window, being protected on all other sides from the light; and the movement of a cotyledon was traced on a horizontal glass. It cir- cumnutated about the same space for the first 24 m., and during the next 1 h. 33 m. moved rapidly towards the light. The light was now (i.e. after 1 h. 57 m.) completely excluded, but the cotyledon continued bending in the same direction as before, certainly for more than 15m., probably for about 27m. The doubt arose from the necessity of not looking at the seed- lings often, and thus exposing them, though momen- tarily, to the light. This same seedling was now kept in the dark, until 2.18 p.m, by which time it had reacquired through apogeotropism its original upright position, when it was again exposed to the light from a clouded sky. By 3 p.m. it had moved a very short distance towards the light, but during the next 45 m. travelled quickly towards it. After this exposure of 1h. 27 m. to a rather dull sky, the light was again completely excluded, but the cotyledon continued to bend in the same direction as before for 14 m. within a very small limit of error. It was then placed in the dark, and it now moved backwards, so that after 1h. 7 m. it stood close to where it had started from at 2.18 p.m. These observations show that the coty- ledons of Phalaris, after being exposed to a lateral
light, continue to bend in the same direction for between a quarter and half an hour. In the two experiments just given, the cotyledons moved backwards or from the window shortly after being subjected to darkness; and whilst tracing the circumnutation of various kinds of seedlings exposed to a lateral light, we repeatedly observed that late in the evening, as the light waned, they moved from it. This fact is shown in some of the diagrams given in the last chapter. We wished therefore to learn whether this was wholly due to apogeotropism, or whether an organ after bending towards the light tended from any other cause to bend from it, as soon as the light failed. Accordingly, two pots of seedling Phalaris and one pot of seedling Brassica were exposed for 8 h. before a paraffin lamp, by which time the cotyledons of the former and the hypocotyls of the latter were bent rectangularly towards the light. The pots were now quickly laid horizontally, so that the upper parts of the cotyledons and of the hypocotyls of 9 seedlings projected vertically upwards, as proved by a plumb-line. In this position they could not be acted on by apo- geotropism, and if they possessed any tendency to straighten themselves or to bend in opposition to their former heliotropic curvature, this would be exhibited, for it would be opposed at first very slightly by apogeo- tropism. They were kept in the dark for 4 h., during which time they were twice looked at; but no uniform bending in opposition to their former heliotropic curvature could be detected. We have said uniform bending, because they circumnutated in their new position, and after 2 h. were inclined in different directions (between 4° and 11°) from the perpendicular, Their directions were also changed after two additional hours, and again on the following morning. We may
therefore conclude that the bending back of plants from a light, when this becomes obscure or is extin- guished, is wholly due to apogeotropism.* In our various experiments we were often struck with the accuracy with which seedlings pointed to a light although of small size. To test this, many seed- lings of Phalaris, which had germinated in darkness in a very narrow box several feet in length, were placed in a darkened room near to and in front of a lamp having a small cylindrical wick. The cotyledons at _the two ends and in the central part of the box, would therefore have to bend in widely different directions in order to point to the light. After they had become rectangularly bent, a long white thread was stretched by two persons, close over and parallel, first to one and then to another cotyledon; and the thread was found in almost every case actually to intersect the small circular wick of the now extinguished lamp. The deviation from accuracy, never exceeded, as far as we could judge, a degree or two. This extreme accuracy seems at first surprising, but is not really so, for an upright cylindrical stem, whatever its position may be with respect to the light, would have exactly half its circumference illuminated and half in shadow; and as the difference in illumination of the two sides is the exciting cause of heliotropism, a cylinder would naturally bend with much accuracy towards the light. The cotyledons, however, cf Phalaris are not cylin- drical, but oval in section; and the longer axis was to the shorter axis (in the one which was measured) as 100 to 70. Nevertheless, no difference could be
* It appears from a reference heliotropically is at the same time in Wiesner (‘Die Undulirenile striving, through apogeotro)ism, Nutation der Internodien,’ p.7), to raise itself into a verticul posi- that H. Muller of Thurgau found tion. that a stem which 1s bending detected in the accuracy of their bending, whether they stood with their broad or narrow sides facing the light, or in any intermediate position; and so it was with the cotyledons o1 Avena sativa, which are likewise oval in section. Now, a little reflection will show that in whatever position the cotyledons may stand, there will be a line of greatest illumination, exactly fronting the light, and on each side of this line an equal amount of light will be received; but if the oval stands obliquely with respect to the light, this will be diffused over a wider surface on one side of the central line than on the other. We may there- fore infer that the same amount of light, whether diffused over a wider surface or concentrated on a smaller surface, produces exactly the same effect; for the cotyledons in the long narrow box stood in all sorts of positions with reference to the light, yet all pointed truly towards it.
That the bending of the cotyledons to the light depends on the illumination of one whole side or on the obscuration of the whole opposite side, and not on a narrow longitudinal zone in the line of the light. -being affected, was shown by the effects of painting longitudinally with Indian ink one side of five coty- ledons of Phalaris. These were then placed on a table near to a south-west window, and the painted half was directed either to the right or left. The result was that instead of bending ina direct line towards the window, they were deflected from the window and towards the unpainted side, by the following angles, 35°, 83°, 31°, 43°, and 39°. It should be remarked that it was hardly possible to paint one-half accurately, or to place all the seedlings which are oval in section in quite the same position relatively to the light; and this will account for the differences in the angles. Five coty-
ledons of Avena were also painted in the same manner, but with greater care; and they were laterally de- flected from the line of the window, towards the unpainted side, by the following angles, 44°, 44°, 55°, 51°, and 57°. This deflection of the cotyledons from the window is intelligible, for the whole unpainted side must have received some light, whereas the oppo- site and painted side received none; but a narrow zone on the unpainted side directly in front of the window will have received most light, and all the hinder parts (half an oval in section) less and less light in varying degrees; and we may conclude that the angle of deflection is the resultant of the action of the light over the whole of the unpainted side.
It should have been premised that painting with Indian ink does not injure plants, at least within several hours; and it could injure them only by stop- ping respiration. To ascertain whether injury was thus soon caused, the upper halves of 8 cotyledons of Avena were thickly coated with transparent matter,—4 with gum, and 4 with gelatine; they were placed in the morning before a window, and by the evening they were normally bowed towards the light, although the coatings now consisted of dry crusts of gum and gelatine. Moreover, if the seedlings which were painted longitudinally with Indian ink had been injured on the painted side, the opposite side would have gone on growing, and they would consequently have become bowed towards the painted side; whereas the curvature was always, as we have seen, in the opposite direction, or towards the unpainted side which was exposed to the light. We witnessed the effects of injuring longi- tudinally one side of the cotyledons of Avena and Phalaris; for before we knew that grease was highly injurious to them, several were painted down one side
with a mixture of oil and lamp-black, and were then exposed before a window; others similarly treated were afterwards tried in darkness. These cotyledons soon became plainly bowed towards the blackened side, evidently owing to the grease on this side having checked their growth, whilst growth continued on the opposite side. But it deserves notice that the curva- ture differed from that caused by light, which ulti- mately becomes abrupt near the ground. These seedlings did not afterwards die, but were much injured and grew badly.
Phalaris Canariensis—Whilst observing the accu- racy with which the cotyledons of this plant became bent towards the light of a small lamp, we were impressed with the idea that the uppermost part deter- mined the direction of the curvature of the lower part. When the cotyledons are exposed to a lateral light, the upper part bends first, and afterwards the bending gradually extends down to the base, and, as we shall presently see, even a little beneath the ground. ‘This holds good with cotyledons from less than ‘1 inch (one was observed to act in this manner which was only ‘03 in height) to about ‘5 of an inch in height; but when they have grown to nearly an inch in height, the basal part, for a length of 15 to ‘2 of an inch above the ground, ceases to bend. As with young cotyledons the lower part goes on bending, after the upper part has become well arched towards a lateral light, the apex would ultimately point to the ground instead of to the light, did not the upper part reverse its curvature and straighten itself, as
soon as the upper convex surface of the buwed- down portion received more light than the lower concave surface. The position ultimately assumed by young and upright cotyledons, exposed to light enter- ing obliquely from above through a window, is shown in the accompanying figure (Fig. 181); and here it muy be seen that the whole upper part has become very nearly straight. When the cotyledons were exposed before a bright lamp, standing on the same level with them, the upper part, which was at first
Phiaris Canariensis : cotyledons after exposure in a box open on one side in front of a south-west window during 8h. Curvature towards the light accurately traced. The short horizontal lines show the level ot the ground, greatly arched towards the light, became straight and strictly parallel with the surface of the soil in the pots; the basal part being now rectangularly bent. All this great amount of curvature, together with the subsequent straightening of the upper part, was often effected in a few hours.
After the uppermost part has become bowed a little to the light, its overhanging weight must tend to increase the curva- ture of the lower part; but any such effect was shown in several ways to be quite insignificant. When little caps of tin-foil (hereafter to be described) were placed on the summits of the cotyledons, though this must have added considerably to their weight, the rate or amount of bending was not thus increased. But the best evidence was afforded by placing pots with seedlings of Phalaris before a lamp in such a position, that the cotyledons were horizontally extended and projected at right angles to the line of light. . In the course of 53 h. they were directed towards tho light with their bases bent at right angles; a | this abrupt
curvature could not have been aided in the least by the weight cf the upper part, which acted at right angles to the plane of curvature. Té will he shown that when the upper halves of the coty- ledons of Phalaris and Avena were enclosed in little pipes of tin-foil or of blackened glass, in which case the upper part was mechanically prevented from bending, the lower and unenclosed part did not bend when exposed to a lateral light; and it occurred to us that this fact might be due, not to the exclusion of the light from the upper part, but to some necessity of the bending gradually travelling down the cotyledons, so that unless the upper part first became bent, the lower could not bend, however much it might be stimulated. It was necessary for our purpose to ascertain whether this notion was true, and it was proved false; for the lower halves of several cotyledons became bowed to the light, although their upper halves were enclosed in little glass tubes (not blackened), which prevented, as far as we could judge, their bending. Nevertheless, as the part within the tuhe might possibly bend a very little, fine rigid rods or flat splinters of thin glass were cemented with shellac to one side of the upper part of 15 cotyledons; and in six cases they were in addition tied on with threads. They were thus forced to remain quite straight. The result was that the lower halves of all became bowed to the light, but generally not in so great a degree as the corresponding part of the free seedlings in the same pots; and this may perhaps be accounted for by some slight degree of injury having been caused by a consider- -able surface having been smeared with shellac. It may be added, that when the cotyledons of Phalaris and Avena are acted on by apogeotropism, it is the upper part which begins first to bend; and when this part was rendered rigid in the manner just described, the upward curvature of the basal part was not thus prevented.
To test our belief that the upper part of the cotyledons of Phalaris, when exposed to a lateral light, regulates the bending of the lower part, many experiments were tried; but most of our first attempts proved useless from various causes not worth specifying. Seven cotyledons had their tips cut off for lengths varying between ‘land -16 of an inch, and these, when left exposed all day to a lateral light, remained upright. In another set of 7 cotyledons, the tips were cut off for a length of only about ‘05 of an inch (1°27 mm.) and these became bowed towards
a lateral light, but not nearly so much as the many other seed- lings in the same pots. This latter case shows that cutting off the tips does not by itself injure the plants so seriously as to prevent heliotropism; but we thought at the time, that such injury might follow when a greater length was cut off, as in the first set of experiments. Therefore, no more trials of this kind were made, which we now regret; as we afterwards found that when the tips of three cotyledons were cut off for a length of 2 inch, and of four others for lengths of -14, -12, -1, and -07 inch, and they were extended horizontally, the amputation did not interfere in the least with their bending vertically upwards, through the action of apogeotropism, like unmutilated speci- mens. It is therefore extremely improbable that the amputation of the tips for lengths of from ‘1 to ‘14 inch, could from the injury thus caused have prevented the lower part from bending towards the light.
We next tried the effects of covering the upper part of the cotyledons of Phalaris with little caps which were impermeable to light; the whole lower part being left fully exposed before a south-west window or a bright paraffin lamp. Some of the caps were made of extremely thin tin-foil blackened within; these had the disadvantage of occasionally, though rarely, being too heavy, especially when twice folded. The basal edges could be pressed into close contact with the cotyledons ; though this again required care to prevent injuring them. Nevertheless, any injury thus caused could be detected by removing the caps, and trying whether the cotyledons were then sensitive to light. Other caps were made of tubes of the thinnest glass, which when painted black served well, with the one great disadvantage that the lower ends could not be closed. But tubes were used which fitted the cotyledons almost closely, and black paper was. placed on the soil round each, to check the upward reflection of
-light from the soil. Such tubes were in one respect far better than caps of tin-foil, as it was possible to cover at the same time some cotyledons with transparent and others with opaque tubes ; and thus our experiments could be controlled. It should be kept in mind that young cotyledons were selected for trial, and that these when not interfered with become bowed down to the ground towards the light. We will begin with the glass-tubes. The summits of nine sotyledons, differing somewhat in height, were enclosed for rather less than half their lengths in uncoloured or transparent
tubes; and these were then exposed before a south-west window ona bright day for 8h. All of them became strongly curved towards the light, in the same degree as the many other free seedlings in the same pots; so that the glass-tubes certainly did not prevent the cotyledons from bending towards the light. Nineteen other cotyledons were, at the same time, similarly enclosed in tubes thickly paintcd with Indian ink. On five of them, the paint, to our surprise, contracted after exposure to the sunlight, and very narrow cracks were formed, through which a little light entered; and these five cases were rejected. Of the remaining 14 cotyledons, the lower halves of which had been fully exposed to the light for the whole time, 7 continued quite straight and upright; 1 was considerably bowed to the light, and 6 were slightly bowed, but with the exposed bases of most of them almost or quite straight. It is possible that some light may have been reflected upwards from the soil and entered the bases of these 7 tubes, as the sun shone brightly, though bits of blackened paper had been placed on the soil round them. Nevertheless, the 7 cotyledons which were slightly bowed, together with the 7 upright ones, presented a most re- markable contrast in appearance with the many other seedlings in the same pots to which nothing had been done. The blackened tubes were then removed from 10 of these seedlings, and they were now exposed before a lamp for 8h.: 9 of them became greatly, and 1 moderately, curved towards the light, proving that the previous absence of any curvature in the basal part, or the presence of only a slight degree of curvature there, was due to the exclusion of light from the upper part.
Similar observations were made on 12 younger cotyledons with their upper halves enclosed within glass-tubes coated with black varnish, and with their lower halves fully exposed to bright sunshine. In these younger seedlings the sensitive zone seems to extend rather lower down, as was observed on some other occasions, for two became almost as much curved towards the light as the free seedlings; and the remaining ten were slightly curved, although the basal part of several of them, which normally becomes more curved than any other part, exhibited hardly a trace of curvature. These 12 seedlings taken together differed greatly in their degree of curvature from all the many other seedlings in the same pots.
Better evidence of the efficiency of the blackened tubes was incidentally afforded by some experiments hereafter to be given, in which the upper halves of 14 cotyledons were enclosed ir tubes from which an extremely narrow stripe of the black varnish had been scraped off. The.e cleared stripes were not directed towards the window, but obliquely to one side of the room, so that only a very little light could act on the upper halves of the cotyledons. These 14 secdlings remained during eight hours of exposure befere a south-west window on a hazy day quite upright; whereas all the other mauy free seedlings in the same pots became greatly bowed towards the light.
We will now turn to the trials with caps made of very thin tin-foil, These were placed at different times on the summits of 24 cotyledons, and they extended down for a length of between 15 and ‘2 of aninch. The seedlings were exposed to a lateral light for periods varying between 6 h. 80 m. and 7 h. 45 m., which sufficed to cause all the other seedlings in the same pots to become almost rectangularly bent towards the ligut. They varied in height from only ‘04 to 1:15 inch, but the greater number were about ‘75 inch. Of the 24 cotyledons with their summits thus protected, 3 became much bent, but not in the direction of the light, and as they did not straighten themselves through apogeotropism during the following night, either the caps were tuo heavy or the plants themselves were in a weak condition; and these three cases may be excluded. There are left for consideration 21 cotyledons; of these 17 remained all the time quite upright; the other 4 became slightly inclined to the light, but not in a degree comparable with that of the many free seedlings in the same pots. As the glass-tubes, when unpainted, did not prevent the cotyledons from becoming greatly bowed, it cannot be supposed that the caps of very thin tin-foil did so, except through the exclusion of tne light. To prove that the plants had not been injured, the caps were removed from 6 of the upright secdlings, and these were exposed before a paraffin lamp for the same length of time as before and they now all became greatly curved towards the light.
Text read by machine from a library scan; expect stray characters. The scan is linked from the book’s page.