The Power of Movement in Plants

As caps between ‘15 und ‘2 of an inch in depth were thus proved to be highly efficient in preventing the cotyledons from bending towards the light, 8 other cotyledons were protected with caps between only 06 and ‘12 in depth. Of these, two remained vertical, one was considerably and five slightly curved towards the light, but far less so than the free seedlings in the sane pots. Another trial was made in a diferent manner, namely, by bandaging with strips of tin-foil, about ‘2 in breadth, the upper part, but not the actual summit, of eight moderately young seedlings a little over half an inch in height. The summits and the basal parts were thus left fully exposed to a lateral light during 8 h.; an upper intermediate zone being protected. With four of these secdlings the summits were exposed for a length of ‘05 inch, and in two of them this part becamo curved towards the light, but the whole lower part remained quite upright; whereas the entire length of the other two seedlings becarce slightly curved towards the light. The summits of the four other seedJings were exposed for a length of ‘04 inch, and of these one remained almost upright, whilst the other three became considerably curved towards the light. The many free seedlings in the same pots were all greatly curved towards the light.

From these several sets of experiments, including those with the glass-tubes, and those when the tips were cut off, we may infer that the exclusion of light from the upper part of the cotyledons of Phalaris prevents the lower part, though fully exposed to a lateral light, from becoming curved. - The summit for a length of 04 or ‘05 of an inch, though it is itself sensitive and curves towards the light, has only a slight power of causing the lower part to bend. Nor has the exclusion of light from the summit for a length of ‘1 of an inch a strong influence on the curvature of the lower part. On the other hand, an exclusion for a length of between ‘15 and ‘2 of an inch, or of the whole upper half, plainly prevents the lower and fully illuminated part from becoming curved in the manner (see Fig. 181) which invariably occurs when a free cotyledon is exposed to a lateral light. With very young seedlings the sensitive zone seems to extend rather lower down relatively to their height than in older seedlings. We must therefore conclude that when seedlings are freely exposed to a lateral light some influence is trans- mitted from the upper to the lower part, causing the latter to bend.

This conclusion is supported by what may be seen to occur on a small scale, especially with young cotyledons, without any artificial exclusion of the light; for they bend beneath the earth where no light can enter. Sceds of Phalaris were covered with a layer one-fourth of an inch in thickness of very fine sand, consisting of extremely minute grains of silex coated with oxide of iron. A layer of this sand, moistened to the same degree as that over the seeds, was spread over a glass-plate ; and when the layer was ‘05 of an inch in thickness (carefully mea- sured) no light from a bright sky could be seen to pass through it, unless it was viewed through a long blackened tube, and then a trace of light could be detected, but probably much too little to affect any plant. A layer ‘1 of an inch in thickness was quite impermeable to light, as judged by the eye aided by the tube. It may be worth adding that the layer, when dried, remained equally impermeable to light. This sand yielded to very slight pressure whilst kept moist, and in this state did not contract or crack in the least. In a first trial, cotyledons which had grown to a moderate height were exposed for 8 h. before a parafiin lamp, and they became greatly bowed. At their bases on the shaded side opposite to the light, well-defined, crescentic, open furrows were formed, which (measured under a microscope with a micrometer) were from ‘02 to ‘03 of an inch in breadth, and these had evidently been left by the bending of the buried bases of the cotyledons towards the light. On the side of the light the cotyledons were in close contact with the sand, which was a very little heaped up. By removing with a sharp knife the sand on one side of the cotyledons in the line of the light, the bent portion and the open furrows were found to extend down to a depth of about ‘1 of an inch, where no light could enter. The chords of the short buried arcs formed in four cases angles of 11°, 13°, 15°, and 18°, with the perpendicular. By the following morning these short bowed portions had straightened themselves through apogeotropism.

In the next trial much younger cotyledons were similarly treated, but were exposed to a rather obscure lateral light. After some hours, a bowed cotyledon, ‘3 inch in height, had an open furrow on the shaded side ‘O04 inch in breadth; another cotyledon, only °13 inch in height, had left a furrow ‘02 inch in breadth. But the most curious case was that of a cotyledon which had just protruded above the ground and was only ‘03 inch in height, and this was found to be bowed in the direction of the light to a depth of 2 of an inch beneath the surface. From what we know of the impermeability of this sand to light, the upper illuminated part in these several cases must have deter- mined the curvature of the lower buried portions. But an apparent cause of doubt may be suggested: as the cotyledons are continually circumnutating, they tend to form a minute

evack or furrow all round their bases, which would admit a little light on all sides; but this would not happen when they were illuminated laterally, for we know that they quickly bend towards a lateral light, and they then press so firmly against the sand on the illuminated side as to furrow it, and this would effectually exclude light on this side. Any light admitted on tho opposite and shaded side, where an open furrow is formed, would tend to counteract the curvature towards the lamp or other source of the light. It may he added, that the use of fine moist sand, which yiclds easily to pressure, was indispensablo in the above experiments; for scedlings raised in common soil, not kept especially damp, and exposed for 9h. 80 m. to a strong lateral light, did not form an open furrow at their bases on the shaded side, and were not bowed beneath the surface.

Perhaps the inost. striking proof of the action of the upper on the lower part of the cotyledons of Phalaris, when laterally iNuminated, was afforded by the blackened glass-tubes (before alluded to) with very narrow stripes of the varnish scraped off on one side, through which a little light was admitted. The breadth of these stripes or slits varied between ‘01 and ‘02 inch (°25 and *51 mm.) Cotyledons with their upper halves enclosed in such tubes were placed before a south-west window, in such a position, that the scraped stripes did not directly face the window, but obliquely to one side. The secd- lings were left exposed for 8 h., before the close of which time the many free seedlings in the same pots hal become greatly bowed towards the window. Under these circumstances, tlic whole lower halves of the cotyledons, which had their summits enclosed in the tubes, were fully exposed to the light of the sky, whilst their upper halves received exclusively or chiefly diffused light from the room, and this only through a very narrow slit on one side. Now, if the curvature of the lower part had been determined by the illumination of this part, all the cotyledons assuredly would have become curved towards the window; but this was fur from being the case. ‘Lubes of the kind just described wero placed on several occasions over the upper halves of 27 cotyledons; J-£ of them remained all the time quite vertical; so that sufticient diffused light did not enter tirough the narrow slits to produce any effect whatever; and they behaved in the same manner as if their upper halves had teen enclosed in completely blackened tubes. The lower halves of the 13 other cotvledons bheeame bowed

not directly in the line of the window, but obliquely towards it; one pointed at an angle of only 18°, but the remaining 12 at angles varying between 45° and 62° from the line of the window. At the commencement of the experiment, pins had been laid on the earth in the direction towards which the slits in the varnish faced; and in this direction alone a small amount of diffused light entered. At the close of the experiment, 7 ot the bowed cotyledons pointed exactly in the line of the pins, and 6 of them in a line between that of the pins and that of the window. This intermediate position is intelligible, for any light from the sky which entered obliquely through the slits would be much more efficient than the diffused light which entered directly through them. After the 8 h. exposure, the contrast in appearance between these 18 cotyledons and the many other secdlings in the same pots, which were all (excepting the above 14 vertical ones) greatly bowed in straight and parallel lines towards the window, was extremely remarkable. It is therefore certain that a little weak light striking the upper halves of the cotyledons of Phalaris, is far more potent in determining the direction of the curvature of the lower halves, than the full illumination of the latter during the whole time of exposure.

In confirmation of the above results, the effect of thickly painting with Indian ink one side of the upper part of three coty- ledons of Phalaris, fora length of *2 inch from their tips, may he worth giving. These were placed so that the unpainted surface was directed not towards the window, but a little to one side; and they all became bent towards the unpainted side, and from the line of the window by angles amounting to 31°, 35°, and 88°. The curvature in this direction extended down to their bases, although the whole lower part was fully exposed to the light from the window.

Finally, although there can be no doubt that the illumination of the upper part of the cotyledons of Phalaris greatly affects the.power and manner of bending of the lower part, yet some observations seemed to render it probable that the simultaneous stimulation of the lower part by light greatly favours, or is aimost necessary, for its well-marked curvature; but our experi- ments were not conclusive, owing to the difficulty of excluding light from the lower halves without mechanically preventing their curvature.

Avenu sutiva.—The cotyledons of this plant become quickly ocwed towards a lateral light, exactly like those of Phalaris. Experiments similar to the foregoing ones were tried, and we will give the results as briefly as possible. They are somewhat less conclusive than in the case of Phalaris, and this may possibly be accounted for by the sensitive zone varying in exten- sion, in a species so long cultivated and variable as the common Oat. Cotyledons a little under three-quarters of an inch in height were selected for trial: six had their summits. protected from light by tin-foil caps, °25 inch in depth, and two others by caps ‘3 inch in depth. Of these 8 cotyledons, five remained upright during 8 hours of exposure, although their lower parts were fully exposed to the light all the time; two were very slightly, and one considerably, bowed towardsit. Caps only °2 or ‘22 inch in depth were placed over 4 other cotyledons, and now only one remained upright, one was slightly, and two considerably bowed to the light. In this and the following cases al] the free seedlings in the same pots became greatly bowed to the light.

Our uext trial was made with short lengths of thin and fairly transparent quills; for glass-tubes of sufficient diameter to go over the cotyledons would have been too heavy. Firstly, the summits of 13 cotyledons were enclosed in unpainted quills, and of these 11 became greatly and 2 slightly bowed to the light; so that the mere act of enclosure did not prevent the lower part from becoming bowed. Secondly, the summits of 11 cotyledons were enclosed in quills °8 inch in length, painted s0 as to be impermeable to light; of these, 7 did not be- come at all inclined towards the light, but 3 of them were slightly bent more or less transversely with respect to the line of light, and these might perhaps have been altogether ex- clnded; one alone was slightly bowed towards the light. Painted quills, ‘25 inch in length, were placed over the summits of 4 other cotyledons; of these, one alone remained upright, a second was slightly bowed, and the two others as much bowed to the light as the free seedlings in the same pots. These two latter cases, considering that the caps were ‘25 in length, are inexplicable.

Lastly, the summits of 8 cotyledons were coated with flexible and highly transparent gold-beaters’ skin, and all became as much bowed to the light as the free secdlings. The summits of 9 other cotyledons were similarly coated with gold-heaters’ skin, which was then painted to a depth of between *25 and °8 inch, so as to be impermeable to light; of these 5 remained upright, and 4 were well bowed to the light, almost or quite as well as the free seedlings. These latter four cases, as well as the two in the last paragraph, offer a strong exception to the rule that the illumination of the upper part determines the curvature of the lower part. Nevertheless, 5 of these 8 cotyledons remained quite upright, although their lower halves were fully illuminated all the time; and it would almost be a prodigy to find five free seedlings standing vertically after an exposure for several hours to a lateral light.

The cotyledons of Avena, like those of Phalaris, when growing in soft, damp, fine sand, leave an open crescentric furrow on the shaded side, after bending to a lateral light; and they become bowed beneath the surface at a depth to which, as we know, light cannot penetrate. The arcs of the chords of the buried bowed portions formed in two cases angles of 20° and 21° with the perpendicular. The open furrows on the shaded side were, in four cases, ‘008, *016, *024, and -024 of an inch in breadth.

Brassica oleracea (Common Red).—It will here be shown that the upper half of the hypocotyl of the cabbage, when illuminated by a lateral light, determines the curvature of the lower half. It is necessary to experimentise on young seedlings about half an inch or rather less in height, for when grown to an inch and upwards the basal part ceases to bend. We first tried painting the hypocotyls with Indian ink, or cutting off their summits for various lengths; but these experiments are not worth giving, though they confirm, as far as they can be trusted, the results of the following ones. These were made by folding gold-beaters’ skin once round the upper halves of young hypocotyls, and painting it thickly with Indian ink or with black grease. As a control experiment, the same transparent skin, left unpainted, was folded round the upper halves of 12 hypocotyls; and these all became greatly curved to the light, excepting one, which was only moderately curved. Twenty other young bypcrotyls had the skin round their upper halves painted, whilst tbeir lower halves were left quite uncovered. These seedlings were then exposed, generally for between 7 and 8 h., in a box blackened within and open in front, either befure a south-west window or a paraffin lamp. This exposure was amply sufficient. as was shown by the strongly-marked heéliotropism of all the free seed- lings in the same pots; nevertheless, some were left exposed to the light for a much longer time. Of the 20 hynocotyls thus treated, 14 remained quite upright, and 6 became slightly bowed to the light; but 2 of these latter cases were not really

exceptions, for on removing the skin the paint was found im- perfect and was penctrated by many small transparent spaces on the side which faced the light Moreover, in two other cases the painted skin did not extend quite halfway down the hypo- cotyl. Altogether there was a wonderful contrast in the several pots between these 20 hypocotyls and the other many free seedlings, which were all greatly bowed down to their bases 1n the direction of the light, some being almost prostrate on the ground.

The most successful trial on any one day (included in the above results) is worth describing in detail. Six young seed- lings were selected, the hypocotyls of which were nearly *45 inch, excepting one, which was °6 inch in height, measured from the bases of their petioles to the ground. Their upper halves, judged as accurately as could be done by the eye, were folded once round with gold-beaters’ skin, and this was painted thickly with Indian ink. They were exposed in an otherwise darkened room before a bright paraffin lamp, which stood on a level with the two pots containing the seedlings. They were first looked at after an interval of 5 h. 10 m., and five of the protected hypocotyls were found quite erect, the sixth being very slightly inclined to the light; whereas all the many ..ce seedlings in the same two pots were greatly bowed to the light. They were again examined after a continuous exposure to the light of 20h. 85m.; and now the contrast between the two sets was wonderfully great; for the free seed- lings had their hypocotyls extended almost horizontally in the direction of the light, and were curved down to the ground; whilst those with the upper halves protected by the painted skin, but with their lower halves fully exposed to the light, still remained quite upright, with the exception of the one which retained the same slight inclination to the light which it had before. This latter seedling was found to have been rather badly painted, for on the side facing the light the red colour of the hypocotyl could be distinguished through the paint.

We next tried nine older seedlings, the hypocotyls of which varied between 1 and 1-6 inch in height. ‘The gold-beaters’ skin round their upper parts was painted with black grease to a depth of only °3 inch, that is, from less than a third to a fourtk or fifth of their total heights. They were exposed to the light for 7 h. 15 m.; and the result showed that the whole of the sensitive zone, which determines the curvature of the lower part, was not protected from the action of the light; for all 9 became curved towards it, 4 of them very slightly, 3 moderately, and 2 almost as much as the unprotected seedlings, Neverthe- less, the whole 9 taken together differed plainly in their degree of curvatnre from the many free seedlings, and from some which were wrapped in unpainted skin, growing in the same two pots.

Seeds were covered with about a quarter of an inch of the fine sand described under Phalaris; and when the hypocotyls had grown to a height of between °4 and °55 inch, they were exposed during 9h. before a paraffin lamp, their bases being at first closely surrounded by the damp sand. They all became bowed down to the ground, so that their upper parts lay near to and almost parallel to the surface of the soil. On the side of the light their bases were in close contact with the sand, which was here a very little heaped up; on the opposite or shaded side there were open, crescentic cracks or furrows, rather above ‘01 of an inch in width; but they were not so sharp and regular as those made by Phalaris and Avena, and therefore could not be so easily measured wnder the microscope. The hypocotyls were found, when the sand was removed on one side, to be curved to a depth beneath the surface in three cases of at least ‘Linch, in a fourth case of ‘11, and in a fifth of -15 inch. The chords of the ares of the short, buried, bowed portions formed angles of between 11° and 15° with the perpendicular. From what we have seen of the impermeability of this sand to light, the curvature of the hypocotyls certainly extended down to a depth where no light could enter; and the curvature must have been caused by an influence transmitted from the upper illuminated part.

The lower halves of five young hypocotyls were surrounded by unpainted gold-beaters’ skin, and these, after an exposure of 8h. before a paraffin lamp, ail became as much bowed to the light as the free seedlings. The lower halves of 10 other young hypocotyls, similarly surrounded with the skin, were thickly painted with Indian ink; their upper and unprotected halves became well curved to the light, but their lower and protected halves remained vertical in all the cases excepting one, and on this the layer of paint was imperfect. This result seems to prove that the influence transmitted from the upper part is not sufficient to cause the lower part to bend, unless it be at the same time illuminated; but there remains the doubt, as in

the case of Phalaris, whether the skin covered with a rather thick crust of dry Indian ink did not mechanically prevent their curvature. Beta vulgaris.—A few analogous experiments were tried on this plant, which is not very well adapted for the purpose, as the basal part of the hypocotyl, after it has grown to above half an inch in height, does not bend much on exposure to a lateral light. Four hypocotyls were surrounded close beneath their peticles with strips of thin tin-foil, °2 inch in breadth, and they remained upright all day before a paraffin lamp; two others were surrounded with strips ‘15 inch in breadth, and one of these remained upright, the other becoming bowed; the band- ages in two other cases were only ‘1 inch in breadth, and both of these hypocotyls became bowed, though one only slightly, towards the light. The free seedlings in the same pots were ail fairly well curved towards the light; and during the follow- ing night became uearly upright. The pots were now turned round and placed before a window, so that the opposite sides of the seedlings were exposed to the light, towards which all the unprotected hypocotyls became bent in the course of 7 h. Seven out of the 8 seedlings with bandages of tin-foil remained upright, but one which had a bandage only °1 inch in breadth, became curved to the light. On another occasion, the upper halves of 7 hypocotyls were surrounded with painted gold- beaters’ skin; of these 4 remained upright, and 3 became a little curved to the light: at the same time 4 other seedlings sur- rounded with unpainted skin, as well as the free ones in the same pots, all became bowed towards the lamp, before which they had been exposed during 22 hours.

Liadicles of Sinapis alba—The radicles of some plants are indifferent, as far as curvature is concerned, to the action of light; whilst others bend towards aud others from it.* Whether these movements are of any service to the plant is very doubtful, at least in the vase of subterranean roots; they probably result from the radicles being sensitive to contact, moisture, and gravi- tation, and as a consequence to other irritants which are never naturally encountered. ‘The radicles of Sinapis alba, when immersed in water and exposed to a lateral light, bend from it, or are apheliotropic. They become bent for a length of about 4 mm. from their tips. To ascertain whether this movement

generally occurred, 41 radicles, which had germinated in damp sawdust, were immersed in water and’ exposed to a lateral light; and they all, with two doubtful exceptions, became curved from the light. At the same time the tips of 54 other radicles, similarly exposed, were just touched with nitrate of silver. They were blackened for a Jength of from ‘05 to ‘07 mm., and probably killed; but it should be observed that this did not check materially, if at all, the growth of the upper part; for several, which were measured, increased in the course of only 8-9 h. by 5 to 7 mm. in length. Of the 54 cauterised radicles one case was donbtful, 25 curved themselves from the light in the normal manner, and 28, or more than half, were not in the least apheliotropic. There was a considerable difference, which we cannot account for, in the results of the experiments tried towards the end of April and in the middle of September. Fifteen radicles (part of the above 54) were cauterised at the former period and were exposed to sunshine, of which 12 failed to be apheliotropic, 2 were still apheliotropic, and 1 was doubt- ful. In September, 39 cauterised radicles were exposed to a northern light, being kept at a proper temperature; and now 23 continued to be apheliotropic in the normal manner, and only 16 failed to bend from the light. Looking at the aggregate results at both periods, there can be no doubt that the de- struction of the tip for less than a millimeter in length destroyed in more than half the cases their power of moving from the light. It is probable that if the tips had been cauterised for the length of a whole millimeter, all signs of apheliotropism would have disappeared.

It may be suggested that although the application of caustic does not stop growth, yet enough may be absorbed to destroy the power of movement in the upper part; but this suggestion must be rejected, for we have seen and shall again see, that cauterising one side of the tip of various kinds of radicles actually excites movement. The conclusion seems inevitable that sensitiveness to light resides in the tip of the radicle of Sinapis alba; and that the tip when thus stimulated transmits some influence to the upper part, causing it to bend. The case in this respect is parallel with that of the radicles of several plants, tho tips of which are sensitive to contact and to other irritants, and, as will be shown in the eleventh chapter, to gravitation.

We do not know whether it is a general rule with seedling plants that the illumination of the upper part determines the curvature of the lower part. But as this occurred in the four species examined by us, belonging to such distinct families as the Graminez, Crucifere, and Chenopodez, it is probably of common oceurrence. It can hardly fail to be of service to seed- lings, by aiding them to find the shortest path from the buried seed to the light, on nearly the same principle that the eyes of most of the lower crawling animals are seated at the anterior ends of their bodies. It is extremely doubtful whether with fully developed plants the illumination of one part ever affects the curvature of another part. The summits of 5 young plants of Asparagus officinalis (varying in height be- tween 11 and 2:7 inches, and consisting of several short internodes) were covered with caps of tin-foil from 0°3 to 0°35 inch in depth; and the lower un- covered parts became as much curved towards a lateral light, as were the free seedlings in the same pots. Other seedlings of the same plant had their summits painted with Indian ink with the same negative result. Pieces of blackened paper were gummed to the edges and over the blades of some leaves on young plants of Tropvolum majus and Ranunculus ficaria ; these were then placed in a box before a window, and the petioles of the protected leaves became curved towards the light, as much as those of the unprotected leaves.

The foregoing cases with respect to seedling plants have been fully described, not only because the trans- mission of any effect from light is «a new physiological fact, but because we think it tends to modify somewhat the current views on heliotropic movements. Until lately such movements were believed to result simply from increased growth on the shaded side. At presert it is commonly admitted * that diminished light in- creases the turgescence of the cells, or the extensibility of the cell-walls, or of both together, on the shaded side, and that this is followed by increased growth, But Pfeffer has shown that a difference in the tur- gescence on the two sides of a pulvinus,—that is, an aggregate of small cells which have ceased to grow at an early age,—is excited by a difference in the amount of light received by the two sides; and that move- ment is thus caused without being followed by in- creased growth on the more turgescent side.t All observers apparently believe that light acts directly on the part which bends, but we have seen with the above described seedlings that this is not the case. Their lower halves were brightly illuminated for hours, and yet did not bend in the least towards the light, though this is the part which under ordinary circum-

fact, that the faint illumination of a narrow stripe on one side of the upper part of the cotyledons of Phalaris determined the direction of the curvature of the lower part; so that this latter part did not bend towards the bright light by which it had been fully illuminated, * Emil Godlewski has given (‘Bot. Zitungy 1879, Nos. 6-0) an excellent account (p. 120) of the present state of the question. Sve also Vines in ‘ Arbeiten des Bot. Lust. in Wiirzbure,’ 1872, B. ii. pp. 114-147. Hugo de Vries has recently published a still more important article cn this sulject : ‘ Bot. Zeitung,’ Dec. 19th and 26th, 1879.

68, 123, &c. Fiank has also insist’'d (‘Die Naturliche wa- gaechte Richtung von Pflan- zentheilcn,’ 1870, p. 53) on the important part which the pulvini of the leaflets of compound Icaves play in placing tie ieaficts in a proper po-ition with respect to the light. This holds yood, especially with the leave- of climbing plauts. which are carried into all sorts of positions, ill-adapted for the action of the hght. but obliquely towards one side where only a little light entered. These results seem to imply the pre- sence of some matter in the upper part which is acted on by light, and which transmits its effects to the lower part. It has been shown that this transmissic.r is independent of the bending of the upper sensitive part. We have an analogous case of transmission in Drosera, for when a gland is irritated, the basal and not the upper or intermediate part of the tentacle bends. The flexible and sensitive filament of Dionza likewise transmits a stimulus, without itself bending ; as does the stem of Mimosa.

Light exerts a powerful influence on most vege- table tissues, and there can be no doubt that it generally tends to check their growth. But when the two sides of a plant are illuminated in a slightly different degree, it does not necessarily follow that the bending towards the illuminated side is caused by changes in the tissues of the same nature as those which lead to increased growth in darkness. We know at least that a part may bend from the light, and yet its growth may not be favoured by light. This is the case with the radicles of Stnapis alba, which are plainly apheliotropic; nevertheless, they grow quicker in darkness than in light.* So it is with many aérial roots, according to Wiesner ;f but there are other opposed eases. It appears, therefore, that light does not determine the growth of apheliotropic parts in any uniform manner.

We should bear in mind that the power of bending to the light is highly beneficial to most plants. There is therefore no improbability in this power having been specially acquired. In several respects light secms to act on plants in nearly the same manner as it does on animals by means of the nervous system.* With seedlings the effect, as we have just seen, is trans- mitted from one part to another. An animal may be excited to move by a very small amount of light; and it has been shown that a difference in the illumination of the two sides of the cotyledons of Phalaris, which could not be distinguished by the human eye, sufficed. to cause them to bend. It has also been shown that there is no close parallelism between the amount of light which acts on a plant and its degree of curva- ture; it was indeed hardly possible to perceive any difference in the curvature of some seedlings of Phalaris exposed to a light, which, though dim, was very much brighter than that to which others had been exposed. The retina, after being stimulated by a bright light, feels the effect for some time; and Phalaris continued to bend for nearly half an hour towards the side which had been illuminated. The retina cannot perceive a dim light after it has been exposed to a bright one; and plants which had been kept in the daylight during the previous day and morning, did not move so soon towards an obscure lateral light as did others which had been kept in complete darkness,

Even if light does act in such a manner on the growing parts of plants as always to excite in them a tendency to bend towards the more illuminated side—a supposition contradicted by the foregoing experiments on seedlings and by all apheliotropic * Sachs has made some striking See his paper ‘ Ueber orthotrope remarks to the same effect with und plagiotrope Pflanzentheile, respect to the various stimuli ‘Arb. des. Bot. Inst. in Wiirzburg which excite movement in plants. 1879 B. ii. p. 282,