Polarity
Polarity is an asymmetric distribution of a property along a body axis, such as head versus tail or apical versus basal. It persists in cut fragments and in single cells. Authors from Vochting to Levin have asked what sets and keeps it: the tissue itself, a chemical gradient, nerve direction or a voltage pattern.
- Earliest held
- 1880, Darwin, C.
- Most discussed in
- Physiological Foundations of Behavior, 1924
- In the library
- 1,011 passages in 81 works
- Rewritten
- 2026-10-03
Polarity in cut pieces
Morgan (1901) reported Vochting's grafting work on plant pieces. Pieces grafted in their original orientation united perfectly, while reversed pieces joined incompletely or later died.1 Vochting claimed that every part has a polar orientation. He held that each living cell of the root is polarized along its length and also radially.1 In short internodal stem pieces, leaf-buds appeared at the apical end even when that end pointed down. Vochting concluded that these pieces show the same polarity as longer ones.2 A ring cut through the cambium made the parts above and below act as separate pieces.2
Gradients and chemical control
Bayliss (1915) described Errera's work on pines. Errera suggested that the apical bud forms an internal secretion that stops lateral shoots growing upward while the bud is present.3 Loeb (1916) worked with leafy stem pieces. He found that leaves speed root growth toward the basal end and inhibit it toward the apical end.4 Child (1915) argued that double apical regions in pieces are not abnormal. He said they follow the same laws as a normal individual, and that raised activity at the basal end may set up a new gradient in the reverse direction.5 Child (1924) added that in very short pieces polarity may follow contact with the substratum, independent of the original polarity.6
Planarian fragments
Lobo, Beane and Levin (2012) describe planarian polarity as most prominent along the head-tail and dorsal-ventral axes. A trunk fragment with head and tail removed always regrows its head in the original orientation, even without the brain and pharynx.7 Pietak and colleagues (2019) set two hypotheses against each other: control by pre-existing morphogen gradients, or by the direction of net innervation. Small fragments without the ventral nerve cord regenerated an axis rotated by 90 degrees. The authors took this to mean that average axon polarity is the dominant driver.8 Fragments with the cord keep the original axis because its large nerves dominate transport.8
Bioelectric prepattern
Levin (2025) places the polarity of the planarian head-tail axis among organ-building cascades tied to voltage states. He states that altering the bioelectric pattern for a few hours can convert regenerating worms to a two-headed form.9 He reports that the two-headed state is permanent and persists without further manipulation.9 He argues that this is not reflected in any genetic change and calls it non-genetic inheritance of morphology.9 Pietak and colleagues' result on nerve direction gives a second, separate account of what fixes the axis in fragments.8
every living cell of the root is polarized, not only longitudinally, but also radially ; each has a different apical and root pole
Morgan, T. H., 1901 · Regeneration · open at passage 455Vochting concludes that the same polarity that is a characteristic feature of longer pieces is also present in internodal pieces.
Morgan, T. H., 1901 · Regeneration · open at passage 185He suggested that the apical bud of the main stem forms some kind of an internal secretion, which prevents the upward growth of the lateral shoots as long as this apical bud is present.
Bayliss, W. M., 1915 · Principles of General Physiology · open at passage 2998the original gradient is almost absent, and the increased activity at the basal end may establish a new gradient in the reverse direction
Child, C. M., 1915 · Individuality in Organisms · open at passage 169the leaves accelerate the growth of roots towards the basal end and inhibit it towards the apical end
Loeb, J., 1916 · The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint · open at passage 266In very short pieces this determination of polarity in relation to the substratum and the differential exposure of the pieces may be quite independent of the original polarity
Child, C. M., 1924 · Physiological Foundations of Behavior · open at passage 318a worm trunk fragment generated by removing both the head and tail will always re-grow its head in the same orientation as the original worm
Lobo D, Beane WS, Levin M, 2012 · Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse-engineering the worm · open at passage 23average neural axon polarity in a fragment is the dominant driver of anatomical polarity via the directional transport of morphogens with respect to nerve polarity
Pietak A, Bischof J, LaPalme J, Morokuma J, Levin M, 2019 · Neural control of body-plan axis in regenerating planaria · open at passage 61Altering the bioelectric pattern for just a few hours can convert regenerating planaria into a
Levin M, 2025 · The Multiscale Wisdom of the Body: Collective Intelligence as a Tractable… · open at passage 44
| 1924 | Physiological Foundations of Behavior · Child, C. M. | 184 |
| 1915 | Individuality in Organisms · Child, C. M. | 120 |
| 1901 | Regeneration · Morgan, T. H. | 72 |
| 1906 | Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation · Bose, J. C. | 70 |
| 1992 | On Growth and Form · Thompson, D. A. W. | 65 |
| 1923 | Protoplasmic Action and Nervous Action · Lillie, R. S. | 62 |
| 1894 | Materials for the Study of Variation Treated with Especial Regard to… · Bateson, W. | 41 |
| 2019 | Neural control of body-plan axis in regenerating planaria · Pietak A, Bischof J, LaPalme J… | 32 |
| 1899 | General Physiology: An Outline of the Science of Life · Verworn, M. | 30 |
| 2016 | Bioelectric modulation of macrophage polarization · Li C, Levin M, Kaplan DL | 26 |