MV
Max Verworn
Portrait: Peter Matzen, Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
1863–1921

Max Verworn

Verworn was a physiologist who worked on single-celled organisms and described excitation as a change in the rate of metabolism. He tested how the rhizopod Difflugia handles building material, studied protozoa cut into pieces, and reported their polar response to electric current.134 His 1899 textbook gave a general theory of stimulus and response.56

Born
4 November 1863
Died
23 November 1921
Country
German Reich
Field
physiologist, university teacher, paleontologist
In the library
1 work, named in 12 passages elsewhere
Facts from
Wikidata · Wikipedia · Open Library
01

Experiments on protozoa

Binet cited Verworn's observations on Difflugia as evidence of instinct in rhizopods. Verworn placed fragments of coloured glass around the animal and later found a heap of them at the bottom of the shell.1 Thompson notes that Rhumbler imitated the shell with oil and sand, and that Verworn was careful not to overstate any sign of choice.2 Morgan reports that Verworn obtained results like Balbiani's: pieces of protozoa without a nucleus failed to regenerate.3 Bose adds that Verworn and others found polar effects in protozoa opposite to those in animal tissue, with the anode exciting at make.4

02

Tropisms and excitation

Jennings quoted Verworn's 1899 statement that chemotaxis, thermotaxis, phototaxis and galvanotaxis follow mechanically from differences in biotonus produced by stimuli at two poles of the cell.5 Child described Verworn's view that excitation is an acceleration in the breakdown of labile protoplasmic molecules.6 Child judged this essentially correct for generalised protoplasm, as a rise in the rate of living. He added that excitation need not be the same in all protoplasms.7

03

Later assessment

Rádl judged Verworn's book harshly. He wrote that it soon lost its original reputation and had very little influence on later physiology.8 The other held authors differ. Child still took up Verworn's account of excitation in 1924, while Jennings treated the tropism theory as something to test.65

SourcesEach quotation was checked word for word against the passage it opens.
  1. Verworn, instead of grains of sand, placed small fragments of colored glass about the animal; some time afterwards, he noticed a heap of these fragments on the bottom of the shell.Binet, A., 1888 · The Psychic Life of Micro-organisms: A Study in Experimental Psychology · open at passage 8
  2. Verworn was very careful not to overestimate the apparent signs of volition, or selective choice, in the little organism’s use of the material of its dwelling.Thompson, D. A. W., 1992 · On Growth and Form · open at passage 1038
  3. Balbiani ('88) found that non-nucleated pieces of cytrostomum, trachelus, and protodon failed to regenerate, and Verworn ('89 and '92) obtained similar results on several other protozoa.Morgan, T. H., 1901 · Regeneration · open at passage 164
  4. It has been found, however, by Kiihne, Verworn, and others, that in the case of the protozoa the polar effects are exactly the opposite ; that is to say, in these instances, it is the anode which excites at make.Bose, J. C., 1906 · Plant Response as a Means of Physiological Investigation · open at passage 505
  5. follow with mechanical necessity as the simple results of differences in biotonus, which are produced by the action of stimuli at two different poles of the free-living cellJennings, H. S., 1906 · Behavior of the Lower Organisms · open at passage 758
  6. that of Verworn (713) asserts that excitation is fundamentally an acceleration in the rate of breakdown or protoplasmic molecules so labile that the excitatory process may be regarded as more or less explosive in character.Child, C. M., 1924 · Physiological Foundations of Behavior · open at passage 457
  7. it appears to be true, essentially as Verworn (713, Chap. V) maintains, that excitation in general is primarily an acceleration in the rate of livingChild, C. M., 1924 · Physiological Foundations of Behavior · open at passage 471
  8. His book soon lost its original reputation; it exerted very little influence on the later developments of modern physiology.Rádl, E., 1930 · The History of Biological Theories · open at passage 934
In the library1 work
Quoted inArticles that quote this person's work